$ git diff main -- vs/coderabbit-vs-greptile.md
commit a1b2c3d - author: Oliver Wakefield-Smith - verified 21 Jun 2026
CodeRabbit ($24/dev/mosrc) wins on platform breadth (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps) and on per-seat economics for teams whose PR volume is steady. Greptile ($30/seat/mosrc) wins on monorepo cross-file context. Pick by codebase shape, not price.
@@ price comparison @@per-seat math
1
teamCodeRabbit $/moGreptile $/modelta
10 devs$240$300+$60 Greptile
50 devs$1,200$1,500+$300 Greptile
200 devs$4,800$6,000+$1,200 Greptile
2Greptile pricing assumes 50 reviews per seat stays inside the included bucket. $1 per extra review applies above thatsrc.
@@ when to pick CodeRabbit @@+ greenlights
1+Multi-platform shop (GitLab and Azure DevOps support out of the box)
2+Steady, predictable PR volume - linear seat scaling is easier to budget
3+Procurement wants a vendor with a longer track record at scale
4+Bills only devs who actually open PRs (idle-seat-free)
@@ when to pick Greptile @@+ greenlights
1+Deep monorepo where cross-file context is the whole point
2+PR volume close to the included 50/seat - the overage stays small
3+GitHub or GitLab only (Azure DevOps is not on the menu)
@@ rollback risk @@how reversible is each
1Both are PR-comment integrations. Removing either is a config flip, not a migration. The harder switch is the team habit: PR authors learn to read one reviewer's comment style and resist the other.
@@ cross-links @@related
1/tool/coderabbit
2/tool/greptile
3/calculator
4/platform/github